Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
papers articles
scientific paper
paper
major
planned
Creators
- John P. A. Ioannidis, author
Canon Rationale
A central reproducibility and meta-research paper, included for research validity, bias, power, false positives, and the modern open-science/reproducibility debate.
Evidence
- citation context: John P. A. Ioannidis, 'Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,' PLOS Medicine 2(8): e124, 2005.
- field survey: Nature Genetics, 'Researching the researchers'.
Audit Flags
epistemic status required
Completion unit: read the full article, treating the title claim as an argument to evaluate rather than a settled fact.